Public adjuster software compared

Choosing software, or thinking of switching? These pages compare ClaimCompass with other tools public adjusters use. Statements about another vendor come from its own public pages, are worded as “as listed” where we quote them, and link to their source with the date we checked. If we could not confirm something, we left it out or said so.

  • ClaimCompass vs ClaimWizard

    ClaimWizard and ClaimCompass compared for public adjusting firms: listed pricing, client portal, migration and AI, with sources and the date we checked.

    Last checked

  • ClaimCompass vs PACMAN

    PACMAN and ClaimCompass compared for public adjusting firms: listed pricing, client portal, migration, photos and AI, with sources and the date we checked.

    Last checked

  • ClaimCompass vs Claim Titan

    Claim Titan and ClaimCompass compared for public adjusting firms: pricing model, AI, client portal and e-signature, with sources and the date we checked.

    Last checked

  • ClaimCompass vs claimOS

    claimOS and ClaimCompass compared for public adjusting firms: listed pricing, AI, client portal and migration, with sources and the date we checked.

    Last checked

What is different about ClaimCompass?

Every feature is on every tier, so the price depends on the number of people, not on which modules you unlock. There are no per-claim fees. Clients get a free portal. Switching is free: import a CSV or Excel export from PACMAN, ClaimWizard or a spreadsheet yourself, or send it and the team migrates it. AI drafts and policy reviews cite the page they came from, and nothing goes out until a person approves it.

Reading about switching? See how migration works.

ClaimWizard, PACMAN, Claim Titan and claimOS are trademarks of their respective owners. ClaimCompass is not affiliated with them. Information comes from their public websites as of the date shown and may have changed.